Public Impact

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Media
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Innovation. Excellence. Service. Impact.
  • Opportunity Culture
  • Teachers & Principals
    • Teacher Leadership
    • Recruit, Select, and Keep Education Talent
    • Competencies of High Performers
    • Evaluating Teacher and Leader Performance
    • Teacher and Leader Compensation
    • Professional Development for Educators
  • Turnarounds
    • Turnarounds Within Schools
    • Restarts by Charter Operators
    • Innovation Zones
  • Funding
    • School Funding
  • Charters
    • Charter School Authorizing
    • Scaling Up Quality
    • Restarts in Failing Schools
    • High Market Share Cities
    • State and Federal Charter School Policy
    • Help for Charter Schools
    • Serving Students with Highest Needs
  • More Topics
    • Big Ideas for Education
    • Entrepreneurship in K-12
    • Parents and Community
    • Philanthropy in Education
    • Special Populations
    • Technology in Schools
    • Assessment and Data

Rethinking School Staffing

written by Public Impact on October 8, 2020

AEI, October 8, 2020, by Nat Malkus

As schools confront massive budget shortfalls in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, it is critical that they examine how they might use existing funding more efficiently. On this episode of The Report Card, Nat Malkus talks with Bryan Hassel about how districts might rethink their staffing models in a way that will increase students’ access to excellent teachers and create opportunities for advancement within the teaching profession, all without spending more money. Byran is the co-president of Public Impact and a contributor to the newly released volume, Getting the Most Bang for the Education Buck. Listen to the podcast…

Database of State Reopening Plans Shows Alarming Lack of Clear Expectations for Student Learning

written by Public Impact on July 29, 2020

Without decisive state expectations and action on remote learning, student learning will suffer: That’s the message from a new analysis of state reopening plans by CRPE (the Center for Reinventing Public Education) and Public Impact. Our just-released database of state reopening plans and accompanying blog post highlight the need for state action now, before it’s too late.

As CRPE’s Ashley Jochim and Public Impact’s Bryan C. Hassel and Beth Clifford detail, state recommendations focus more on the logistics of reopening than on what matters most—student learning. As the authors write, the “absence of clear expectations is certain to contribute to inequities across school and district responses.”

They call for states to address the gaps in learning caused by school closures in the spring, avert a worsening educational crisis, and help districts manage their pandemic-created challenges.

The database shows that:

  • Only 15 states require districts to plan for remote learning, even though increasing numbers of districts plan to start the year online. State plans generally lack both clear expectations for implementation and schedules for monitoring progress and closing gaps.
  • Less than half of states require districts to submit a plan for in-person or hybrid reopening, and only one in four states outline a clear process to review the plans.
  • Despite a few promising examples, many states are failing to lead the way on closing the digital divide. Based on rapidly changing data, approximately 38 states’ written plans address device access and connectivity, but more than half of those plans leave responsibility for digital access to districts.
  • Only five states require districts to assess student learning needs this fall, and only seven require them to implement strategies for accelerating learning or addressing learning loss.
  • Of states requiring remote learning plans, only 11 states require specific practices to support students with disabilities and only seven do so for English language learners.

How does your state stack up? Check the database.

At a minimum, the authors say, states must establish ambitious expectations for teaching and student learning in all settings, clarify how those expectations can be met with remote learning, work rapidly to close gaps in access to devices and internet connectivity, and monitor local efforts in these areas so states can step in when districts are falling short.

States can set expectations for districts, they note, without encroaching on local control. Rhode Island, for example, requires districts to show comparable rigor for online and in-person instruction, while California’s legislature enacted remote learning requirements to address gaps during the spring at-home instruction.

“If states don’t quickly provide more direction on the core work of schools—teaching and learning—the most vulnerable students will pay the price in lost learning,” said Bryan C. Hassel, co-president of Public Impact. “But it’s not too late. Decisive action now could change the trajectory of millions of students.”

CRPE and Public Impact will release more analyses in the coming weeks, including in-depth looks at state virtual instructional platforms, how states are tapping stimulus dollars, statewide supports for teachers, and statewide instructional policies.

Pinpointing Problems in COVID Response Plans

written by Public Impact on July 22, 2020

“Student learning is an afterthought in many state reopening plans; that’s a huge mistake”

We’ve been working with the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) to create a database of all states’ reopening plans, accompanied by a series of briefs and analyses. The database will be published soon. Meanwhile, a new blog by CRPE’s Ashley Jochim and Georgia Heyward and Public Impact’s Beth Clifford provides a peek at the early findings.

“CRPE and Public Impact are wrapping up our review of state reopening plans. If first impressions portend what’s to come, there are big reasons to be concerned,” the authors write.

What’s missing in the plans? While they provide a needed focus on protecting the health of students and staff, they let students down by failing to provide an equal focus on student learning.

“The enormity of this moment is why it is so essential that states step in now to ensure that districts offer students meaningful opportunities to learn—whether in-person, in a blended model or remotely. If states allow logistical considerations to crowd out everything else, they will place the most vulnerable students at risk of even greater learning loss in 2020–21,” the authors say.

See the full post here, and we’ll be back in your inbox soon with the full database and further analyses.

Comparing some specific state strategies

Alongside our work with CRPE, we responded to a request from Bluum, a nonprofit helping cultivate great school leaders and innovative schools in Idaho, to look at state strategies on some specific issues for reopening schools. Initially intended for policymakers and school leaders in Idaho, Bluum decided to post our working draft for wider sharing. Based on a review of national media, third-party reports, and a select number of state plans chosen based on their similarities to Idaho, the document looks at such questions as:

  • whether and how states are allowing districts to measure “attendance” in new ways during remote learning,
  • what flexibilities states are granting to districts on teacher evaluation, licensure, or certain state funds,
  • how states are addressing technology needs,
  • and more. We’ll continue to update the document as we get more information.

[Read more…]

Exploring statewide trends and equity gaps in North Carolina districts’ responses to COVID-19

written by Public Impact on June 29, 2020

Education NC, June 29, 2020, by Jessica Struhs, Troy Smith, Beth Clifford, Preston Faulk and Cole Smith

This data summary analyzes trends in the NC District Responses to COVID-19 School Closures database completed on June 5, 2020, which is an update of the database first published on April 23, 2020. In developing the database, researchers first searched for districts’ publicly posted distance learning plans on district and school websites and social media pages. As a follow-up to the initial research, EdNC sent a survey to North Carolina school districts in an effort to fill in gaps and gain context for district and school responses. This database thus reflects publicly posted distance learning plans as well as districts’ self-reported responses to COVID-19 school closures. Note that the database shows what districts report they are doing, but it may not reflect actual implementation.

In an effort to illuminate statewide trends and explore equity gaps among North Carolina districts’ responses to COVID-19 school closures, the Public Impact data team broke out each indicator in the database along seven district characteristics, as shown in the table below: percentage of students of color, district wealth, district size, percentage of students receiving free and reduced-price lunch, county computer and internet access, percentage of students who are in special education, and percentage of students who are English language learners. Read more…

North Carolina district responses to COVID-19: An updated database from EdNC and Public Impact

written by Public Impact on June 29, 2020

Education NC, June 29, 2020, by Molly Osborne, Jessica Struhs, Troy Smith and Beth Clifford

In March 2020, the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) released “District Responses to COVID-19,” an online database tracking how some of the nation’s largest public school districts have shifted instruction, student support, and organizational operations in response to COVID-19 school closures. CRPE continues to update the database on a regular basis as district plans shift and evolve.

In April, EdNC and researchers from Chapel Hill-based Public Impact joined forces to create a North Carolina version of this database to provide a similar set of information for state leaders, district leaders, school leaders, and the public. We published this initial database on April 23, 2020.

In alignment with CRPE’s national database, the North Carolina database outlined districts’ responses to COVID-19 according to a series of standard indicators, covering curriculum, instruction, progress monitoring, centralization, learning time, and technology. For more on the initial database, read this article.

Since April 23, both district plans and CRPE’s national database have evolved. To reflect those changes, EdNC and Public Impact again joined forces to update the North Carolina database, resulting in the second iteration of NC District Responses to COVID-19 School Closures. Read the full article…

Committing to Anti-Racism: Public Impact’s Statement

written by Public Impact on June 2, 2020

The deaths of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor are the tip of a mammoth iceberg of racial injustice in our nation.

Behind these three injustices are millions of others, large and small, that, when unaddressed, leave those in power unchecked and emboldened to perpetuate more. As loud as the shouting of protestors may be right now, the sound of silence at the routine, everyday wrongs is the most deafening.

When a Black man in his own yard is assumed to be an intruder. When a birdwatcher is threatened for politely asking a white woman to follow park rules. When a shopper is followed around the store because of the color of her skin. When the promotion goes elsewhere, the pay is lower, and the police baton is wielded sooner. None of these are due to the actions of the victims, but all because of their race. This isn’t just unfair: It’s systematic, psychological warfare.

All of us at Public Impact are grieving with loss and sickened by all of this.

So, what will we do? Our commitment and resolve to fight injustice are only strengthened by current events, and we stand with the many partner organizations making and bolstering these same commitments.

Internally, we will continue to: hold routine, intentional conversations that address racism head on; review and correct policies and management actions for bias, racism, and unfairness; and seek and support a diverse workforce in their professional success. We commit to making improvements every year, knowing we can always do more, and should. We commit to continuing to work toward being an anti-racist organization by ensuring that all team members understand the history of racism in American education, holding ourselves accountable to people of color, and empowering people of color.

Externally, we will continue to make Public Impact’s mission the focus of our time and energies: to improve education dramatically for all students, especially low-income students, students of color, and other students whose needs historically have not been well met. We will continue to partner with educators to achieve this mission. We will improve our work to combat racism within schools and to promote a more equitable, safe, and joyful education system and world for all students. We will share materials our team has developed to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion with other organizations in the field, and seek their wisdom, too.

But we and other education reform organizations must acknowledge that the disparities affecting Black people in our country occur regardless of education levels. Therefore, we also stand with the Black community and others demanding broader, dramatic changes for justice, accountability, equity, and the opportunity to live free from fear. We commit to continuing to do the work of reflecting on our own role in dismantling racism and speaking up more often.

We commit to working with our past, current, and future colleagues in the field for systemic change, knowing that single organizations and political leaders have not achieved the transformation needed to stop racial violence and discrimination.

With grief, anger, and hearts hungry for change,

Public Impact

Public Impact®

Public Impact, LLC
Chapel Hill, NC
919-240-7955

Public Impact encourages the free use, reproduction, and distribution of our materials, but we require attribution. If you adapt the materials, you must include on every page “Adapted from PublicImpact.com; Copyright Public Impact” in the font size specified here.

Materials may not be sold, leased, licensed, or otherwise distributed for compensation. See our Terms of Use page or contact us for more information.

Public Impact is certified as a living wage employer by Orange County Living Wage.

Search

Subscribe

Sign Up for E-News!
 


 
Read Back Issues of our
E-Newsletter

 
Subscribe to our blog with RSS

Follow

New from Public Impact

Employment Opportunities—Analysts and Coordinators
Public Impact is seeking candidates for Analysts and Coordinators to join our team in Spring/Summer 2021. The application deadline for the Analyst and Coordinator positions is Monday, March 8.

Learning in Real Time—How Charter Schools Served Students During Covid-19 Closures
Profiles highlight how charter schools were able to respond quickly to school closures during the pandemic and continue to serve their students well.

Building an Effective Staff—Profiles of Leaders of Color
Three-part series looks at how being a person of color affected the ways in which successful charter school leaders built schools where students, families, and staff learn, grow, and thrive.

Engaging Families—Profiles of Leaders of Color
Three-part series looks at how being a person of color affected the ways in which successful charter school leaders built schools where students, families, and staff learn, grow, and thrive.

Building a Strong School Culture—Profiles of Leaders of Color
Three-part series looks at how being a person of color affected the ways in which successful charter school leaders built schools where students, families, and staff learn, grow, and thrive.

The Impact of School Restarts—Lessons from Four Indianapolis Schools
Report analyzes how enrollment, demographic, and student performance data changed following the restarts of four charter schools in Indianapolis, IN.

Learning from Project L.I.F.T.—Legacy of a Public-Private School Turnaround Initiative
Report examines successes, challenges, and lessons from a private-public district turnaround initiative.

Public Impact, LLC | 919-240-7955 | Terms of Use | © Public Impact 2000-2021 | Wordpress website design by LeGa Design Group